Profound is one of the most visible names in AI search analytics. It is built for enterprise brands and agencies: nine answer engines, AI marketing agents that run on credits, API access, SSO, all-time data history and dedicated support. Large marketing organizations pick it because it is designed to be rolled out across teams.
That positioning is also the reason people search for a Profound alternative. There is no self-serve plan and no published price. The public trial runs for seven days with 50 prompts on three engines; after that, you talk to sales. For a small business, a SaaS startup or a boutique agency, that is a lot of process for a question that starts with “does ChatGPT recommend us?”
Facts about Profound come from its public pricing page, checked on September 22, 2026.
What Profound does well
- Coverage: nine answer engines on Enterprise, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Claude and DeepSeek.
- Enterprise tooling: API access, SSO/SAML, projects, all-time data history, dedicated support and agency solutions.
- AI marketing agents and a context manager that go beyond reporting into automated work, priced on credits.
- Scale: custom prompt volumes for brands that need thousands of prompts monitored.
Why teams look for a Profound alternative
- No published pricing and no self-serve plan; Enterprise is quote-based, and third-party reviews consistently place it in enterprise budget territory.
- The free trial is seven days with 50 prompts on three engines and no data history, so it is a preview rather than an evaluation of the full product.
- Agents run on credits, which adds a second usage dimension to understand and budget for.
- For a team of one or two marketers, most of the platform is unused surface area.
Searcherries as a Profound alternative
Searcherries answers the same first questions as Profound: is our brand mentioned, who is recommended instead, which pages are cited, and is any of it turning into visits. It does so with public pricing, a free one-off report and a 14-day trial, without a sales call.
Coverage is close on the platforms most teams care about. Searcherries tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude and Grok on every plan. Profound adds engines such as DeepSeek and offers custom prompt volumes; Searcherries counts usage in question units, 10 a month on Starter and 50 on Pro.
Where Searcherries goes further for smaller teams is the connected data: Google Search Console, Bing Webmaster Tools and GA4 AI traffic sit in the same project, and you can ask Wizard or connect the data to Claude or Codex via MCP. Where Profound goes further is enterprise governance, API and agents. Those are real differences, and they point to different buyers.
Profound vs Searcherries
Side by side, using the vendors’ public plan details. Prices are list prices and can change; the Profound website and the Searcherries pricing page always have the current numbers.
| Criteria | Profound | Searcherries |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free 7-day trial, then Enterprise with custom pricing after a demo. | Starter $19/mo ($180/yr), Pro $89/mo ($850/yr). Every plan includes all six AI platforms. |
| AI platforms | 3 on the trial (ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews); 9 on Enterprise including Perplexity, Claude and DeepSeek. | 6: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude, Grok. No per-engine add-ons. |
| Prompts / questions | 50 daily prompts on the trial; custom volume on Enterprise. | 10 question units/mo on Starter, 50 on Pro. A question on 3 platforms uses 1 unit, on all 6 uses 2. Checks run on a schedule. |
| Data history | None on the trial; all-time on Enterprise. | All checks are stored; Overview, Competitors and Citations cover 30, 60 and 90 days, this year and last year. |
| Competitors and citations | Competitor benchmarking and citation analysis. | Discovered from the answers themselves, with mentions, AI visibility, average rank and what each platform highlights about a brand. Every cited URL per platform, with citation counts. |
| Organic search and traffic data | Enterprise integrations; details on request. | Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools in the same project, plus Content Ideas from GSC. GA4 AI traffic: visits, engaged sessions, conversion actions and entry pages per AI source. |
| Automation and access | AI marketing agents on credits, API, SSO/SAML, projects. | Wizard (5 questions/mo on Starter, 10 on Pro) and a read-only MCP server for Claude, Codex and other clients. |
| Trial | 7 days, limited credits, no support. | Free one-off AI visibility report, then a 14-day free trial. |
| Best for | Enterprise brands and large agencies with procurement, SSO and API requirements. | Small businesses, SaaS teams and agencies with a handful of brands that want AI visibility and organic search data in one place. |
Other Profound alternatives worth a look
Searcherries is not the only option. These tools come up in the same comparisons, and each has its own comparison page.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Profound cost?
Profound does not publish prices. The public plan is Enterprise with custom pricing after a demo, and the free trial lasts seven days. Searcherries publishes its prices: Starter is $19/mo and Pro is $89/mo.
Does Searcherries have an API like Profound?
Searcherries does not offer a public REST API. It offers a read-only MCP server, so Claude, Codex and other MCP clients can read your projects, metrics, competitors, citations and connected analytics data.
Can a small business use Profound?
Technically yes, but the product and pricing are designed for enterprise teams. Searcherries is built for small businesses, SaaS teams and agencies with a few brands, with a free one-off report and a 14-day trial.
Verdict
Profound is the right tool for enterprise teams that need governance, API and agents. For everyone else, Searcherries is the practical alternative: six platforms included, published pricing from $19/mo, and organic search and AI traffic in the same project.
Not sure yet? Run the free AI visibility report for your own website and compare the results with what you see in Profound.
